Heathrow expansion delay

  • Published: 08 July 2008 13:23
  • Last Updated: 08 July 2008 13:37
  • Reader Responses  
Protestors against a third runway at Heathrow

Building a third runway at Heathrow has proved controversial

Transport secretary Ruth Kelly today announced an indefinite delay to the results of its consultation into Heathrow's expansion, which examines the construction of a third runway, amongst other projects.

The consultation examined expansion at Heathrow airport, including the construction of a third runway and changes to the use of the existing facilities.

Kelly said, "Almost 70,000 individuals and organisations representing all sides of the debate responded to the Adding Capacity at Heathrow Airport consultation, which my officials are still analysing. That process is itself also subject to quality assurance and peer review to ensure its integrity.

"Our work on analysing the consultation responses, on completing the Equalities Impact Assessment, and finalising the overall Impact Assessment will take some more time to complete.  But I intend to inform the House of my decision on the future development of Heathrow airport before the end of the year."

Commenting on Ruth Kelly's announcement, Liberal Democrat shadow transport secretary Norman Baker said:

"Today's delay could be a chink of light for those fighting against Heathrow's expansion.

"It looks like the Government has realised quite how unpopular its policy is and is now looking for a way out.

"Alternatively it could be that BAA is away on holiday and Ruth Kelly is simply awaiting further instructions from the aviation industry," he said.

Kelly added that, "the Government supports the further development of Heathrow by adding a third runway and exploring the scope for making greater use of the existing runways, subject to meeting strict local conditions on air quality and noise and improving public transport access."


Please note: In order to post a response you need to be registered on the site. You can register here.

Reader Response

It would seem that Ruth Kelly will be damned if she hurries out a report and recommendations, and if she takes her time she will also be criticised. If a project of this scale is to go forward then it is right and proper that the consultation process is entirely fair and robust. 70,000 consultation responsives requires a great deal of analysis and the end of the year does not seem unrealistic.

I suppose they are still trying to get the emission calculations to work, it may well take them longer than until the end of the year.

How can you report Ruth Kelly is suggesting an idefinite response when she clearly states that she will give her decision by the end of this year.