By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Talking Point with Jim De Waele

The challenges of doing business are being made harder than they need to be due to delays in being paid for work, according to Jim De Waele

Doing business in the construction sector today isn’t for the faint hearted. Margins are tight and there is a long list of investment possibilities for our cash, including improving how we work sustainably, design innovation, evolving HSEQ systems and the advent of BIM. What we don’t need right now is the spectre of late payments, retentions and a move towards 120-day payment terms.

Cash flow can make or break a business and even more so for the many smaller businesses that operate in the construction sector. Federation of Piling Specialist (FPS) members are not immune to these pressures, relying on quality cash flow to service their “must-pay” expenses such as wages and salaries, equipment and materials purchases, interest payments, as well as research and development.

So, when it comes to cash flow, our sector has welcomed the advent of Project Bank Accounts (PBA), an initiative from the Cabinet Office, which has delivered certainty of payment on public sector construction projects. In fact, where they exist, the cash profile is improved significantly with payments being both regular and reliable.

Suppliers and subcontractors would prefer the principals to make the margins they deserve directly from their construction activities rather than leveraging cash

PBAs, a ring-fenced bank account from which payments are made directly and simultaneously by a client to members of their supply chain, clearly have benefits. However, several high-profile principal contractors have recently gone on the record complaining that this new mechanism is unworkable when they - the PCs - are working at such low margins.

This may be true, but withholding cash from the supply chain is not the answer either. Suppliers and subcontractors would much prefer it if the principals made the margins they deserved directly from their construction activities rather than leveraging cash.

While the FPS supports PBAs, they are yet to be common across the whole of the industry, which is why the FPS is a strong supporter of the NSCC’s Fair Payment Campaign, which tackles a number of issues relating to payment.

Take the out-dated issue of retentions, which the FPS and pretty much all sectors of the construction supply chain see as unnecessary in the modern construction environment. Taking retentions neither guarantees nor incentivises quality in any given works. It is far better to be diligent in selecting the subcontractor in the first place as this is the only real guarantee of competence. Audited membership of organisations such as the FPS, which stand for the highest levels of health and safety, training and technical performance, should be seen as a real differentiator when making these choices.

Being at the end of a supply chain can be a tough place, when everyone “up the line” is managing their creditors. It is a buyer’s market and everyone is seeking to drive a hard bargain. However, for the specialists among us, while we can and should be prepared to be challenged on price, let’s not capitulate on the terms that drive that all important commodity - cash!


Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

    NCE newsletters

    Financial Force

    Free whitepaper

    Managing people for profits


    London's £14.5bn Crossrail scheme

    Full details

    Find out more

    Linked In

    Follow NCE on LinkedIn

    Stay in touch through NCE's online community